|
What's a cool Web page? Realistically, it's a page that accomplishes its purpose with style and panache. There are several rules of design to be followed that will keep you out of major trouble. They won't make you any more creative, but they will establish a strong foundation for your creativity:
Every graphic element you place on a page must have a function. Either it adds to communication efficiency or. . . remove it! Each visual element on a page must be processed and either used or discarded. The more visual elements a viewer has to discard, the less efficient the communication.
Everyone can learn to recognize and appreciate good music. Most can learn to play simple tunes on a piano. Some can learn to read music and play credibly. A very few become concert pianists.
Such is the case with visual art. Not everyone needs (or wants) to make their own Web graphics. But everyone should be able to recognize when good design principles are followed, when text is used effectively, and when color adds and doesn't subtract from a page.
The key to all this is developing what I call "a good eye." I used to tell my students that it isn't the answers they don't know, it's the questions. Invariably I would look at a student's drawing and start a question-like, "where is the. . . ?" and not even get the rest of the question out before the student realized why their drawing was wrong and told me the answer.
The trick to developing a good eye is to have a continuous dialog with yourself concerning the design. This technique can be applied to the design of the Web site itself as well. For starters, ask yourself the following:
Just about everyone knows that a computer monitor is comprised of rows and columns of dots called pixels. Just like cylinders in a car engine, the more you have the more powerful you feel. But on the Web, it's not so much what you have, but how efficiently you use it. When making graphics for the Web, the following constraints are important:
[Finally, and possibly most important,] the relationship of these factors controls the amount of memory required to store and display your graphic. For example, create a great graphic at 1280 by 1024 (raster dimension) and your file size looks like the national debt. Increase the resolution to 1200 dots per inch and the raster dimensions stretch across the room. Increase the bit depth from 8 bits to 16 or 24 bits per pixel, and the file you used to transport around on disk [now requires something like a] writable CD-ROM.
Just keep this etched on your cortical matter: Always create the smallest, tidiest, most efficient graphic that does the job.
Situations when you might entertain the use of graphics at higher resolutions and bit depths include the following:
The need for simple and efficient (small file size) graphics for the Web, means that using not more than 256 colors, at 72 to 96 dpi, is best for everything except photographic type images. Further, on most 256 color systems, we are using indexed color; where 256 specific colors are selected for use, out of all the colors possible in 24-bit color. With each Operating system causing a slightly different selection of which 256 colors, even when the same Web browsing program is used. This Results in only 216 "safe" colors, which will hopefully display in a manner close to what was actually intended, on most 256 color systems.
HINT: I try to make this site 256 color friendly by using a combination of the 216 "safe" colors, plus the 16 shades of gray. (Some of the gray shades are in both, so this combination contains 226 colors.) About the only color this does not provide, is a nice shade of very light blue. . . which would fall about half-way between two of the Browser safe colors.(#CCCCFF and #CCFFFF.)
To overcome this 256-color limitation, a technique called dithering is applied to the image. This is sort of like halftoning in traditional publications. Dithering approximates intermediate colors (colors not on the palette) with a pattern of dots that, when viewed from afar, blend together in glorious shades. The best results are achieved when using a diffusion dither, which produces smooth transitions. A pattern dither produces geometric patterns that may be less desirable.
A Related Resource: |
|
>> |
ColorMix Create more "safe" colors by the dithering of color. |
Traditional publications made careful use of color partially because color meant more expense. With display publications, color isn't any more expensive than black and white. Unfortunately, when color is so easily available it is often misused and overused.
Color was also carefully used because even though everyone loves it, there isn't much evidence that color increases the effectiveness of communications where color isn't the subject. (Color would be critical, for example, in recognizing changes in skin color with chemical exposure or identifying the RED tag.)
In fact, judicious use of grays can be almost as effective as color for making visual discriminations. Unfortunately, Web graphics are limited to using the grays available in the indexed color palette. [Again, for this site, the 216 "safe" colors + 16 shades of gray.] In-between grays can be dithered to give the impression of having the full 256 grays available in 8 bits of color depth.
Anti-alias is especially effective when displaying text above 24 points. Because most text will be a solid color, the stair-stepping around curves is often distracting. By applying the anti-alias technique, intermediate pixels are calculated on either side of the normal outline, giving the appearance of a smoother curve. Figure 3.13 shows the detail of a serif, without anti-alias on the left and with anti-alias on the right.
Figure 3.13: The use of anti-alias to give the appearance of smoothness.
An anti-aliased letter like that shown in Figure 3.13 can break apart when reduced because original pixels may not match up with pixels at the new scale. When enlarged, the image may become unsightly when its anti-aliased pixels are enlarged.
Do not anti-alias small font-size type, as that will blur the letters-- sort of like a photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopy. Which in turn will destroy the clear legibility of the text. Not to mention that anti-aliasing small fonts can cause a large increase in the file-size for an image. Thus I would suggest that for most situations, do not even consider anti-aliasing text with a font-size of 16 pixels or smaller. (That would be about 16 points on a Mac, or 12 points on a PC.)
Otherwise, when a smaller font absolutely has to be anti-aliased, then this must be done by hand. Where only one or two intermediate colors (between the color of the text and the background) are selected. Then for letters such as O and S, only the curved lines are anti-aliased, by providing the fewest intermediate pixels required to make the letter look acceptably smooth.
Related Information: |
|
>> |
<font> Coding Pitfalls Web development font problems and solutions. |
Blurring is another technique that yields slightly different but effective results. Blurring an area alters all the pixels within the selection, not just those on the outside.
Like most things in life, more is usually better, and in bit depth and resolution this is also true. Although you will be displaying graphics in 8 bit, 256 color, you will want to start with more color and resolution than you need. This gives you greater flexibility in making the image look the way you want it to when you reduce the color depth and resolution.
Some suggestion for how to do this:
A copyright is a grant of exclusive use for a period of time. For something to be copyrightable, it must embody unique intellectual property. If something doesn't pass this test of uniqueness, it is considered to be a common design of industrial utility. That's why automobile shapes can't be copyrighted. That's also why font shapes can't be copyrighted. It's fair to estimate that less than half the material carrying copyright notice is actually copyrightable, that is, would be deemed unique intellectual property in a court of law.
Copyright protection is granted upon the simple act of making something of unique intellectual property. There is no search-- as there is when applying for a patent. You don't have to prove anything when applying for a copyright. You don't even have to apply for the copyright as long as you can prove creation date.
Every copyright carries with it a presumption of fair use. That is, a copyrighted graphic can appear in a news report or a magazine article without infringement because that's considered fair use.
How can you get around this? Use the following guidelines when planning Web graphics:
The likelihood that your use of some material carrying a copyright will be challenged in court is directly proportional to the economic resources available to the copyright holder. Like Clint Eastwood would say, "Do you feel lucky?"
Personally, I wouldn't put anything of real creative value on the Web. The ease with which images and page source code can be captured is part of the Web's allure, one of the reasons its potential is difficult to estimate.
The Web can be a teaser, though. Put enough information out there to generate interest. Want the real thing? Send $9.95 by midnight tonight. If you want to add some protection, put the copyright (©) symbol and a statement of ownership beside anything you think you want to protect. This will scare the timid away.
The flip side of this is that some of the information found on the Web is of no value whatsoever, or even dangerously incorrect. Buy a book of conversion standards from a publisher, and you can almost guarantee that the numbers were checked by outside reviewers, proofread, edited, and backed by the author. Much information on the Web should carry a "Consumer Beware" disclaimer.
* |
E-mail the Webmaster Page Content Updated: November 6, 2003 |
This document is my personal study notes. Not something that was authorized by the author or the publisher of this book. All excerpts from the original book are just fragments of material, with the book being quoted from providing the context and full meaning. This selection of excerpts, along with any annotations added to them, are Copyright © 2000- 2003 Allen Smith. All rights reserved, to protect the Copyright of the original (quoted from) work. Thus permission is not granted to save, print or copy these notes in any manner.